Live broadcast bar, October 14 -prior to this, Yang Yi, a well-known commentator, revealed in the radio program “Yang Yi Kan ball” that the narrator of each platform was officially warned that the content was as follows: “No matter whether the judgment of the referee is good or bad, whether it is correct or not, it is not allowed to evaluate the judgment of the referee and the level of the referee when explaining and commenting.”
Later, another basketball commentator Zhu Yanshuo gave his own opinion on weibo. He wrote: “One thing to say, CBA does not allow the narrator to say the referee. It is really very happy. Indeed, some narrator’s criticism of the referee is not based on business, but on their own preferences for the team. To say something nice is to stand on the fans’ stand, and to say something bad is to hold a group to warm up and seek approval. To put it bluntly, it is hard to say whether the rules they recognize are the same as those recognized by the referee. You say they are blind **blowing, but to a large extent, they are blind** scolding.
“But can the referee criticize? Of course. I never criticize whether the referee is “black whistle” or not. I only talk about “scale ‘. If you assume that the referee will be biased, then you don’t have to watch the ball; It’s OK for the fans to have this idea, and if some explanations also hold this view, they are not qualified to go up and explain. There must be a degree in everything. Don’t overdo your duty and do something grandstanding.
“Public opinion cannot replace the judgment of the referee, but public opinion will influence the judgment with the wind direction; This is just like public opinion cannot replace the justice, but it can affect the judicial justice. Ask yourself, is this normal?”
Relevant news >>> CBA official warning narrator of each platform: do not comment on the penalty and level of the referee in the commentary/comment
What do you think of the penalty scale of CBA referees in the new season?