The new season is approaching, and the Eastern foresight has no time to make paid content. It is expected that the playoff team will make a brief comment in the next few days. Start with basketable nets and stag. Since the “badge” of the Eastern team has not been sorted out yet, first compare the scores of basketable nets and bucks with those of the Western playoff team.
1. Basketable nets
The following figure shows the number of badges and comprehensive scores of the basketable Nets team. Figure 1 shows the comprehensive score based on badge level, and Figure 2 shows the number of players with at least “pending 3” level.
The paper strength of basketable nets seems to have never been the focus of their problems. Royce O’Neal was introduced leave allowances, and Simmons was finally able to play on behalf of the team, directly filling up their missing defense and front-line counterposition resources. The confrontation between the preseason and the Bucks should also show everyone that basketable nets’s combat power under the relatively complete lineup should not be underestimated. In several key areas, basketable nets has the alliance’s top resource reserves:
Du Ou is at the top of the league with no difference in singles ability;
Du ou cooperated with many high-end shooters to play the top league in potty chair fields;
The total space score alliance is top. Although there is no full-space lineup with both attack and defense, the team with the most top shooters except warriors;
He has four relieve a garrison experts, including West, AO, Du, and fourth brothers;
Simmons and O’Neal are two leading defenders, basically covering all counterpositions except position 5.
Compared with Bruce Brown, Simmons has not only slightly sacrificed some space and vitality, but also upgraded in defense, high-end counterposition, transmission and control, and promotion. As a cover for small ball play, he is bigger and can make more articles. In addition to the shabby counterposition of the heavy Center, there is no serious resource vacuum field in basketable nets. The style of the small ball is obvious. They are similar to the way of adding points to a Western Haoqiang.
Basketable nets only two players in the whole team have both “space” and “relieve a garrison” badges-Durant and O’Neal-but this is not too shabby in the context of the lack of 3D in the whole league, because both of them will appear in their only lineup, and the only lineup has two points with both space and relieve a garrison, which belongs to the normal level.
In some specific functions, basketable nets has a very subtle correspondence with Warriors:
Top projection, excellent relieve a garrison, but badly injured backup defense strength: Thomson, Durant;
It can prevent multiple positions and has spatial attributes, but it will still be placed in the top defense point: Wikins, Royce O’Neal;
Generally, the strength of the back-court attack that does not undertake the Defense Task is curry and Owen; (however, under the environment of basketable Nets last season, Owen will lead the defense)
There is no space attribute, but the central axis of the front line with strong defense and transmission control is green and Simmons.
These four players are also the four cards that are bound to appear in the final lineup of the two teams. I wonder how to choose the last card. The Warriors had four answers last season:
Body shape and defensive direction: Luni
Defense and vitality: little Peyton
Both projection and body: PROTONIC
Attack burst: Poole
None of these four choices can be called the only answer, but they cover various allocation methods of attack and defense resources. They can make choices according to specific needs, and they can basically cope with various situations. Now take away the two cards in the middle, and the available alternative cards need to be cultivated and screened again, so there is no need to talk about it.
Three confirmation cards are available in basketable nets:
Body shape and defensive direction: Claxton
Top projection: Little Curry/Harris
There are also some low-end tasting cards available:
Both projection and body type: machev Morris
Defense and vitality: Watanabe
Pseudo 3D dual: Edwards
Pull the ball: Thomas
These people have their own functions, and the common problem is also very simple-the comprehensive strength is insufficient and can only be used as a temporary option.
There is also an uncertain X card on basketable nets-TJ Warren. Although there are great doubts about his current abilities in all aspects, in the best case, he is a flanking point that can provide ball holding, vitality, certain space and body shape. If Warren works, the choice of the only lineup of basketable nets opens up another dimension, and the competitiveness is undoubtedly more anticipated.
Obviously, you can’t place all your hopes on a lottery ticket that has not played for a long time. Basketable nets the best way to get the last card is to overlap the functionality of the two in the contract of Joe Harris or Xiao Curry, with Mills behind them as the next replacement, using one of them to cooperate with the talent show assets left by Harden’s transaction to find 3D in the market is not difficult to think of a way to complete the ultimate puzzle basketable nets. The difficulty is, how can it be so easy to find the right person?
Claude asked for a deal, didn’t the opportunity come?
If four people in the final lineup of basketable Nets have played number 4 in their respective teams (Simmons, O’Neal, Durant, Claude), then their five little logic will hopefully stand. However, there is no reason for the Sun to add undefensible shooters to the overflow number 2. The deal is not so easy to reach.
What I mean by tikleod is that there are still candidates on the market. As the season progresses, this kind of people will increase-the dynamic direction of pioneers and Kings must be closely watched.
In theory, basketable Nets have the opportunity to accumulate a top playoff rotation lineup. Durant, Owen, Simmons, O’Neal, Clarkston, Curry/Harris/Mills saved the second place, plus a 3D puzzle obtained by an unknown transaction, which was enough to play the top series. Of course, their biggest trouble is not here. Whether these X factors will benefit them is the key to the cohesion of the team, the resource allocation of the coaching staff and duoxi’s attendance rate.
Basketable Nets want to grab a beautiful start, quickly dispel the haze that lasts for leave allowances, so that they have enough spirit and record reserves to deal with all kinds of troubles that may occur during the season. After that, we need some shelter of “luck” and pray that there will be no moths. This is very metaphysics, but metaphysics matches basketable nets.
2. Stag
The following figure shows the number of “badges” owned by the stag team and the comprehensive score. Figure 1 shows the comprehensive score based on badge level, and Figure 2 shows the number of players with at least “pending 3” level.
In addition to “military training”, The Stag has at least a midstream level in all fields, including “defense assistance”, “potty chair”, “relieve a Garrison”, “Roll Call”, “space”, many fields, such as “assault”, “control field”, “defense”, “front court counterposition”, are among the top of the alliance.
As an evaluation system in a single field, the “badge” series was originally planned not to calculate the total score. However, after the sub-evaluation is completed, it is difficult for you to withstand the temptation of “do not add a piece to see. So I also made a preliminary Weighted calculation and got a ranking list based on the “badge” series, which may be released tomorrow. This ranking does not make much sense, because the weighted coefficient regression requires a large number of samples to be completed. In the case that this series has just been born, a large number of samples obviously do not exist, and there is no difference between talking about weighting and shooting the head. It is made purely to satisfy curiosity and see which player and team dominate in the “badge” evaluation system.
At present, the stag has a great advantage in this system. In fact, it is not just my “badge” system that thinks so. If it is converted according to EPM of last season, the core rotation intensity of Bucks is also very high. Based on the estimation of various systems and data, it is certainly not the same as the real strength of a team, but it can tell us such a thing-the stag has a good resource base.
Therefore, the 0-5 defeat in the preseason may not require people to worry too much about the status of the Bucks. They also pretended to be dead in the 20-21 season, and later proved that they just didn’t care so much about the regular season, and they paid some costs for practicing new games.
But the stag did have some trouble. Middleton will not come back immediately. They should be prepared without him at the beginning of the season. Compared with this near worry, Daluo’s poor state is a longer-term hidden danger-is this the topic we discussed two years ago?
As a rare heavy center with both projection and basket protection, Daluo has a very special value for Bucks and letters. After his career entered a downward period, the stag must be prepared to find a replacement in the future, but the players of the same style with him are quite scarce. Portis’s excellent performance seems to have solved this problem. During the absence of Dalo last season, the Bucks did prove that he could play well without Dalo. Due to the existence of letters, even if Daluo is absent, the internal defense of the Bucks will not crash. Portis has a good moving speed and sufficient defense, and can well implement the team’s defense strategy, and with the versatility of the offensive end, he handed over the comprehensive competition influence that he did not lose in Daluo. In the case that Portis has continued to 2026, it can be said that the stag is ready for the possible variables of Daluo.
However, numerical addition and subtraction cannot simply summarize the value of a key rotation. The existence of Daluo represents some special attribute of stag:
On the defensive end, there are two top-level basket guards that can be placed on the court at the same time. A heavy heavy device in a large-tonnage Middle Road and a leak check. Such cooperation can completely block the paint area without giving any chance to attack the basket flow team;
On the offensive side, there are three big players who can be placed on the court at the same time. The three advantages of letters, DALO and Portis are superimposed to crush small teams.
Generally speaking, there is a contradiction between adding shape and adding projection. The stag’s opponents hit potty chair with projection, which is likely to reduce their size, and the stag will counter them at the other end. As a result, they achieved “playing big” without losing space, and could “block” their opponents at both ends. On the other hand, if the stag “play big” is not smooth, they still have the ability to play the center with letters to turn five small, and there is great room for adjustment.
For the winning team, absolute strength is on the one hand, and it is on the other hand that it can deal with opponents of various styles. If there is room for adjustment, it means not eating the opponent type, so that the soldiers come and stand, and the water comes from nowhere.
Of course, the stag himself did not do well enough in dispatching troops, which was another topic. But anyway, Daluo means a set of competition strategies, which is one of the reasons why the stag is “big and small”. Before finding another Daluo, of course, the stag hopes that his state will last as long as possible, this is one of the key points we need to pay attention to in the new season.
In addition, there is another question about the stag-whether the stag is still one card away from the real complete body?
Stag takes the route of “relieve a garrison-type lineup”. In addition to the three giants, there are 5 optional cards:
Portis. Have projection and body type. The disadvantage is that relieve a Garrison is a passing grade, and the effect of playing the top backcourt team is doubtful (although Shaoxia helped him prove it feasible);
Matheus. Short but powerful, relieve a garrison elasticity is the best among these cards, and the attack is also the worst;
COINER tons. The size of the second position is good in defense, the projection is relatively reliable, and it has certain value in hand-playing;
Gregson Allen. Among these people, the defensive is the worst, and the advantage is that the shooter attribute is the most distinct;
Jeff Carter. Projection, defense and a small amount of ball Holding, the disadvantage is that the size is too small.
The Stag didn’t have a perfect 5-person group to take the small line-up route. On the surface, the reason was that the stag didn’t have a qualified front line rotation, which made their relieve a garrison rating seem extremely high, in fact, it is not a strike brigade in the general sense. However, the deep-seated reason is not here. As a top-level flank, Matheus’s height does not affect his ability to take over the big front line. The key is that he is worse than his predecessor PJ Tucker’s attack, it is difficult to make up for the positive effect of the defensive end.
In my previous article on bucks, I commented on them like this-the three major generals basically took over most of the functionality of this team. In addition, there are only potis and Dalo left with special functionality, everyone else is like a whiteboard number two. For a big three, this phenomenon is not surprising. In fact, compared with the general big three teams, it is very rare for the Bucks to have many high-level puzzles.
But for the stag, what the master can’t do is that the whole team can’t do it. The three major stag generals have only one short board-they are rough in seeking dislocation attacks. Huo Ledi’s organization, single killing and strong eating, and ball throwing all have something, but only limited to something, each of which is a good level of seven or eight. Middleton is more famous in the field of ball holding and singles, but as the third place with flat dynamic talent, he is dissatisfied in finding dislocation up and down. Letters are too fond of going straight. There are few changes to cover people and lack patience in naming names. The big three tamped their own teams and played ordinary teams very well. If they met teams with top counter resources, they had to dig into details. The stag does not have a tactical shooter to enrich the choices of the three giants. Judging from the hand-over effect of COINER tons and letters in the playoffs, this cooperation is not meaningless, but the level of COINER tons is not enough.
So, will Ingels enrich the bucks?
He has both projection and organization. When the opponent hides the weakness of single defense in him, he has much room for imagination with the blocking and splitting of letters. Ingles is old and badly injured. What level is doubtful after the return, and the hidden danger on the defensive end is even greater. However, it is generally not a bad thing to add one more type card that was not available before. The more resources you hoard, the more room you have, and it is difficult for teams that have ways to deal with various scenes to be defeated.
Although for Buden, there are too many choices……